RE: [Full-Disclosure] Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing
From: Jonathan A. Zdziarski (jonathan_at_nuclearelephant.com)
Date: 09/21/03
- Previous message: debian-security-announce_at_lists.debian.org: "[Full-Disclosure] [SECURITY] [DSA-389-1] New ipmasq packages fix insecure packet filtering rules"
- In reply to: Richard M. Smith: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing"
- Next in thread: Nate Hill: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Richard M. Smith" <rms@computerbytesman.com> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:49:11 -0400
LOL I don't know any people who would run Norton even if they had a free
copy. Just about everyone I know uses McAfee (of course, that's at my
recommendation).
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 19:55, Richard M. Smith wrote:
> My understanding is that most of the spammers are selling pirated
> versions of Norton. Symantec has every incentive to shut these spammers
> down.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: debian-security-announce_at_lists.debian.org: "[Full-Disclosure] [SECURITY] [DSA-389-1] New ipmasq packages fix insecure packet filtering rules"
- In reply to: Richard M. Smith: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing"
- Next in thread: Nate Hill: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Symantec wants to criminalize security info sharing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|