Re: [Full-Disclosure] Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new

From: Brian Hatch (full-disclosure_at_ifokr.org)
Date: 09/17/03

  • Next message: Paul Tinsley: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] EXPLOIT : RPC DCOM (MS03-039)"
    To: Thor Larholm <thor@pivx.com>
    Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:28:18 -0700
    
    
    

    > This is simply amazing, Verisign has just turned the .COM and .NET TLD
    > DNS servers up-side-down for their own economical gain and, in doing so,
    > disrupted network traffic for most of the Internet. Mail administrators
    > who use any non-existant DNSBL to mark email as spam suddenly has all
    > their mails deleted, people using localhost.localdomain.com on their
    > servers for administrative purposes are scrambling to find out the cause
    > of their problems and DNS problems arise everywhere as neg caching is
    > essentially disabled and all DNS caches have to cache each and every
    > randomly typed DNS query.
    >
    > The BIND patch that prevents this should be released Wednesday.

    I hate to muck with a DNS server to fix this problem. And since
    I prefer DJBDNS, a BIND patch wouldn't do me any good anyway.

    Is it always returning the same IP address, or have any other
    noticable characteristics? If so I'd think we could set up
    a firewall rule to drop all DNS replies that contain the
    Verisign-be-damned IP address. That'd protect everything,
    regardless of name server or method of access (using
    host/nslookup/etc manually.)

    --
    Brian Hatch                  "The universe is run by
       Systems and                the complex interweaving
       Security Engineer          of three elements: energy,
    http://www.ifokr.org/bri/     matter, and enlightened
                                  self-interest."
    Every message PGP signed
    
    

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


    • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

  • Next message: Paul Tinsley: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] EXPLOIT : RPC DCOM (MS03-039)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
      ... Mail administrators ... > of their problems and DNS problems arise everywhere as neg caching is ... > essentially disabled and all DNS caches have to cache each and every ... > The BIND patch that prevents this should be released Wednesday. ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • Issues migrating SBS 2003 domain to Server 2008 Standard
      ... We are stuck migrating our SBS 2003 domain to Server 2008. ... Fatal Error:DsGetDcName (SRV-EXCH) call failed, ... Verify your Domain Name Sysytem (DNS) is ... network connectivity to a domain controller. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: AD management snap in cannot find DC (netdiag /v workstation)
      ... The name.local entries are used by my apache server to implement ... change button, more button, the "Primary DNS suffix of this ... Attr: subschemaSubentry ... Owner of the binding path: ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: AD management snap in cannot find DC (netdiag /v workstation)
      ... button, more button, the "Primary DNS suffix of this computer", it should ... The Security System could not establish a secured connection with the server ... Attr: subschemaSubentry ... Owner of the binding path: ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: AD management snap in cannot find DC (netdiag /v workstation)
      ... DNS Host Name: tonyb-pc.imageproc.imageproc.com ... Testing IpConfig - pinging the DHCP Server... ... Attr: subschemaSubentry ... Owner of the binding path: ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)