Re: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft
From: Peter van den Heuvel (peter_at_bank-connect.com)
Date: 09/11/03
- Previous message: William Warren: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft"
- In reply to: Rainer Gerhards: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft"
- Next in thread: William Warren: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft"
- Reply: William Warren: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 23:24:44 +0200
> Honestly, I still can't follow you on this route. I wouldn't purchase
> the XBOX first place because MS intention with it is well-known. If you
> repair these "defects" and make it even more succcessful (because of
> this) in the marketplace - is that really good? Wouldn't it be better to
> make it an economic failure so that vendors see this is the wrong
> approach (as the music industry now slowly learns)?
This might be a bit besides the point. The post was like:
"This happened!". "Is that illegal?".
If by any chance it would realy BE illegal, that would be highly
significant from many perspectives. It could very well set precedents
for many other products and "suppliers".
So, if anybody is knowledgable in the area...
Peter
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: William Warren: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft"
- In reply to: Rainer Gerhards: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft"
- Next in thread: William Warren: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft"
- Reply: William Warren: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Computer Sabotage by Microsoft"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|