Re: [Full-Disclosure] 9/11 virus
l8km7gr02_at_sneakemail.com
Date: 09/10/03
- Previous message: Arthur Clune: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fwd: How to Steal a Mainframe"
- In reply to: Bassett, Mark: "[Full-Disclosure] 9/11 virus"
- Next in thread: Rainer Gerhards: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] 9/11 virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:19:55 -0400
Have these sorts of articles *ever* done any good?
"The 9/11 virus contains the headline "It's Near 911" or a similar
variation, as well as an attachment labeled "911.jpg." Users should not
open the e-mail or the attached file."
Coaching like this gives precisely the wrong message -- 'Don't open this
specific e-mail or try and view this specific attachment and you'll be
fine!'
Of course, users who regularly send and receive joke/cute file
attachments hardly benefit from the 'Don't open unexpected attachments!'
admonishment.
Add the inevitable batch of new 9/11 viruses to the heap of
avoidable-but-commonplace user-dependent vulnerabilities.
Cael
-------- Original Message --------
> Here we go again.. :P
>
> http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2003/0904firstofpe.html
>
> By Dan Verton
> Computerworld
> 09/04/03
>
> Antivirus researchers late Wednesday discovered what is being described
> as the first of potentially many "9/11" anniversary viruses spreading on
> the Internet...
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Arthur Clune: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fwd: How to Steal a Mainframe"
- In reply to: Bassett, Mark: "[Full-Disclosure] 9/11 virus"
- Next in thread: Rainer Gerhards: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] 9/11 virus"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|