Re: (SPAM?) [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls...
From: Manfred Schmitt (konfusius_at_gmx.de)
Date: 08/31/03
- Previous message: ned: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenBSD 3.2 Kthread Madness"
- In reply to: Jim Race: "Re: (SPAM?) [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Next in thread: Michael Scheidell: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 07:50:06 +0200
Jim Race wrote:
> Nice try binky.
>
> Content analysis details: (5.60 hits, 5 required)
>
-4.7 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 10 to 20%
So in total my spamassassin gives me an 1.3, no spam.
Hm, -4.7 is a bit much for 10-20% spam, rescored to -2 :-)
Bye,
Manne
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: ned: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenBSD 3.2 Kthread Madness"
- In reply to: Jim Race: "Re: (SPAM?) [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Next in thread: Michael Scheidell: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|