Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Blaster author / morning_wood misinformed

From: yossarian (yossarian_at_planet.nl)
Date: 08/31/03

  • Next message: Paul Schmehl: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Blaster author / morning_wood misinformed" 
    To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 01:32:20 +0200

    Entering is going into a house without breaking a lock. Breaking in, well,
    that is when there is some lock, and it is broken. Insurance companies
    really like this difference, if there is no signs of breaking and entering
    (which b.t.w. is a legal term in the US also...), you don't get money.

    Furthermore, if you don't lock your car, and sometime the pohlice checks,
    you'll be fined. I think that is absolutely correct, since you are wasting
    law enforcements time and taxpayers money, if you make it too tempting. Kind
    of biblical, don't lead someone into temptation. But hey, where a
    calvinistic country, just look at our PM's face....

    Bit sad this has to be explained. Think some people in security need some
    legal training.
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Paul Schmehl" <pauls@utdallas.edu>
    To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
    Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 7:17 PM
    Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Blaster author / morning_wood misinformed

    > --On Saturday, August 30, 2003 6:22 PM +0200 Peter Busser
    > <peter@trusteddebian.org> wrote:
    > >
    > > I don't know about US, Canadian, German or Chinese law. But in Dutch law
    > > there is a big difference between entering a house and stealing stuff
    and
    > > breaking into a house and stealing exactly the same stuff. Apparently
    the
    > > house owner has a responsibility of his own.
    > >
    > And the difference is?
    >
    > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
    > Adjunct Information Security Officer
    > The University of Texas at Dallas
    > AVIEN Founding Member
    > http://www.utdallas.edu
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Paul Schmehl: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MS Blaster author / morning_wood misinformed"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Lock picking to survive
      ... IF the guy WANTED you to have it, he wouldn't have put the lock on it. ... It's called "breaking and entering". ... house to get what you really need like soap, rice, extra socks, etc, ...
      (misc.survivalism)
    • [Full-Disclosure] ReMS Blaster author / morning_wood misinformed
      ... Entering is going into a house without breaking a lock. ... Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • bwahahahahah
      ... > "There you are Mr. Baker, your new house! ... I'd like the lock replaced with a better ... > "Well sir, I'm afraid your model of house isn't supported anymore. ... > specifically that only Bill the Builder is allowed to alter your ...
      (alt.computer.security)
    • Re: Home Invasions
      ... I doubt anyone would be able to approach the house without my ... All your doors have at least one lock with no mechanism outside? ... You are keeping a shotgun handy. ... You must be real paranoid about those home invasions. ...
      (rec.martial-arts)
    • Re: Honeypots Illegal?
      ... is locked it's breaking & entering. ... Even that is not trespass. ... you by your negligence contribute to damage to a third party, ...
      (comp.os.linux.security)