Re: (SPAM?) [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls...
From: Jim Race (caferace_at_well.com)
Date: 08/30/03
- Previous message: Jeremiah Cornelius: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GOOD: A legal fix for software flaws?"
- In reply to: Mike _at_ Suzzal.net: "[Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Next in thread: Manfred Schmitt: "Re: (SPAM?) [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Reply: Manfred Schmitt: "Re: (SPAM?) [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com'" <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:35:23 -0700
Nice try binky.
Content analysis details: (5.60 hits, 5 required)
HOME_EMPLOYMENT (1.6 points) BODY: Information on how to work at
home (2)
HTML_FONT_FACE_ODD (0.1 points) BODY: HTML font face is not a
commonly used face
HTML_60_70 (0.5 points) BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML
HTML_MESSAGE (0.1 points) BODY: HTML included in message
KNOWN_MAILING_LIST (-0.5 points) Email came from some known mailing
list software
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK (3.7 points) Forged mail pretending to be from MS
Outlook
MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME (0.1 points) Message looks like Outlook, but isn't
-jim
Mike @ Suzzal.net wrote:
> Home and business firewalls
>
>
>
> Question to ponder:
<blah, blah, blah...>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Jeremiah Cornelius: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GOOD: A legal fix for software flaws?"
- In reply to: Mike _at_ Suzzal.net: "[Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Next in thread: Manfred Schmitt: "Re: (SPAM?) [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Reply: Manfred Schmitt: "Re: (SPAM?) [Full-Disclosure] Lets discuss, Firewalls..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|