Re: [Full-Disclosure] Firewalls
From: Nathan Seven (scosol_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/14/03
- Previous message: Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats): "[Full-Disclosure] New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038?"
- In reply to: CHeeKY: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Zach Forsyth: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: CHeeKY <cheekypeople@sec33.com>, joey2cool@yahoo.com, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Agreed- though there still are plenty of good uses for
app-level firewalls.
I use and recommend Kerio as well here at work.
It's very useful for things like blocking Realplayer's
phone-home functionality, etc etc :)
--- CHeeKY <cheekypeople@sec33.com> wrote:
> why are you buying application layer firewalls? dont
> as a security person
> you learn anything?
>
> get hold of a spare 386, and make a netbsd, ipcop,
> smoothwall, linux based
> firewall, alot of fun and a *** load better, I will
> personally stick with
> my checkpoint box, but please please start taking ya
> firewalls of your own
> machines, they deserve a place of their own, ON
> THEIR OWN BOX, Tiny and the
> rest have all been breached with deep packet
> inspections through nemesis, at
> the end of the day, its still Layer 7
=====
-- live- http://www.thedenofsin.org/ to- AIM: IMFDUP penetrate- http://eAnger.org/ _our women expect asskissing beyond what we can deliver. they want a pussywhipped mofo, but would be bored shitless by one._ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Stahlkrantz, Mats (Mats): "[Full-Disclosure] New Blaster variant using UDP port 1038?"
- In reply to: CHeeKY: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Zach Forsyth: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]