RE: [Full-Disclosure] "MS Blast" Win2000 Patch Download

From: Brad Bemis (Brad.Bemis_at_airborne.com)
Date: 08/14/03

  • Next message: Robert Ahnemann: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: new msblaster on the loose?" 
    To: "Ed Carp" <erc@pobox.com>, "Anjan Dave" <adave@vantage.com>, full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:21:56 -0700

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    > It's probably worth mentioning even more that if you have
    > port 135 bocked on your firewall, you wouldn't have to worry
    > about it :(

    Personally I am getting tired of people making these kinds of comments. It
    is obvious that these people have never had responsibility for a
    large-scale, multi-national enterprise environment that touches so many
    different organizations world-wide that it is nearly impossible to account
    for every single Internet access point (not to mention remote access and
    mobile computers). While it may be true that blocking port 135 at the
    firewall would work in an ideal environment, very few of us that deal with
    security matters in the real world have anything that even begins to
    approach an ideal environment. We need to be discussing real solutions to
    real problems, not verbalizing a continued ignorance of reality. Sorry for
    the rant, but this topic is getting old quickly!

    Thank you for your time and attention,

    ========================
    Brad Bemis
    ========================

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQA/AwUBPzu3JJDnOfS48mrdEQJ1GACg984qft3Pbr5v2SXbG2Yi72T65rYAoMeH
    N6LbpR3GXG27Dx19DEthJP0N
    =GRs4
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Robert Ahnemann: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: new msblaster on the loose?"