Re: [Full-Disclosure] MSBlast DDoS

From: Steffen Kluge (kluge_at_fujitsu.com.au)
Date: 08/14/03

  • Next message: Robert Lemos: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: updated 135/tcp log counter mrtg image"
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:43:22 +1000
    
    
    

    On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 00:08, Benjamin M.A. Robson wrote:
    > This is almost right. The packets should go straight to the firewall
    > and out to the Internet, unless there is a device (such as the firewall
    > itself) performing some sort of NAT redirect for the purposes of a
    > transparent proxy. If this is the case then the packets will be sent
    > via the proxy, and if they are not properly formed HTTP commands (GET,
    > HEAD, etc..) the proxy server should reject them as bogus.

    According to eEye, the DOS attack is a SYN flood. Thus, it wouldn't even
    get to the stage where HTTP is spoken. In a transparent proxy setup, the
    proxy server will suffer the SYN flood and nothing will get out.

    In a non-transparent proxy setup the proxy likely wouldn't see the
    packets (since msblast.exe isn't looking for proxies). Hence it depends
    on whether the Internet firewall mandates HTTP connections to be made
    through a proxy, or whether it just allows anybody to make outbound
    HTTP connections. In the former case, the firewall will drop the SYN's
    (unless the proxy itself is infected), in the latter case you'll SYN
    flood windowsupdate.com.

    In short, it is a good idea to allow outbound HTTP connections from
    proxy servers only (and always has been). It is an even better idea not
    to run the proxies on top of Windows.

    Cheers
    Steffen.

    -- 
    Steffen Kluge				Tel: +61 2 9887 9449
    Security Specialist			Mobile: 0413 486 390
    Fujitsu Australia Ltd			Facsimile: +61 2 9887 9458
    376 Lane Cove Rd			Email: steffen.kluge@fujitsu.com.au
    North Ryde NSW 2113			Website: www.fujitsu.com.au
    This is an e-mail from Fujitsu Australia Ltd. It is confidential to the
    ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed and may
    contain copyright and/or legally privileged information. No one else may
    read, print, store, copy or forward all or any of it or its attachments.
    If you receive this e-mail in error, please return to sender. Thank you.
    The recipient of this e-mail should be aware that this e-mail and any
    attachments to it might not be free from viruses in their various forms.
    Fujitsu Australia Ltd strongly recommends that the recipient uses
    anti-virus software to screen all e-mails received externally.
    Fujitsu does not accept any liability for any loss or damage that may
    occur as a result of the transmission of this e-mail to the recipient.
    
    

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



  • Next message: Robert Lemos: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: updated 135/tcp log counter mrtg image"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [fw-wiz] dirty packet tricks?
      ... solve via promiscuously sucking up packets. ... restriction that your 'sideways' proxy box is it will have to be on a hub ... The firewall will have to suppress all ICMP errors to the internal network ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: [fw-wiz] httport 3snf
      ... >> wouldn't have gotten SSH out of my firewall. ... > Postfix SMTP server with a wildcard MX that handed the mail that wasn't ... > destined to me off to the downstream MS stuff, and an HTTP proxy server ... All it needs is a written policx "Internet access is ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: Kids bypassing firewall via web proxy sites
      ... We use a Sonicwall firewall, 3060, I subscribe to content fltering, ... I checked "Access to HTTP Proxy Servers" But I am still able to get to ... CyBlock, which does network proxy and filtering ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: Tool to find hidden web proxy server
      ... No reason the proxy has to be INSIDE your firewall. ... Cell Phones to just bypass your firewall completely. ... On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, vinay mangal wrote: ... policy for Internet access says it is through IP ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • Re: NAT is not a mechanism for securing a network.. but.. HELP!
      ... tell you a NAT router is a firewall. ... > There is this one hot chick at a major American news network, ... >proxy, and come to a chat room where her and I have been chatting, she has ... >admins at the station she works for. ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)