Re: [Full-Disclosure] MSblast worm
Mike.Keighley_at_lexicon.co.uk
Date: 08/12/03
- Previous message: Andrew Thomas: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS"
- Maybe in reply to: Jasper Blackwell: "[Full-Disclosure] MSblast worm"
- Next in thread: tom_at_doctorunix.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MSblast worm"
- Reply: tom_at_doctorunix.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MSblast worm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:05:04 +0100
Ah, yes. The vulnerability does indeed exist in NT.
But with respect, what Jasper asks is whether the *MSblast worm* affects
NT ?
The exploit code and discussions on here seem to suggest it targets only
2000 and XP.
Does *this exploit* target NT successfully ? Not that I have seen /
heard.
Could an exploit be written which exploits NT ? Oh yes.
-- Mike Simon Glassman <simon@bsdbox.co.uk> wrote: > This is affecting the following machines. > Windows NT 4.0 server > Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server Edition > Windows 2000 > Windows XP 32 Bit Edition > Windows XP 64 Bit Edition > Windows Server 2003 32 Bit Edition > Windows Server 2003 64 Bit Edition > More info <snip> security/bulletin/MS03-026.asp >> On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:53 am, Jasper Blackwell wrote: >> Does anyone know if this MSblast worm affects Win NT machines, >> or is it just infecting 2000 and XP. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Andrew Thomas: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Dcom Worm planned DDoS"
- Maybe in reply to: Jasper Blackwell: "[Full-Disclosure] MSblast worm"
- Next in thread: tom_at_doctorunix.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MSblast worm"
- Reply: tom_at_doctorunix.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] MSblast worm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|