Re: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft win2003server phone home

From: Gaurav Kumar (gaurav_at_e2-labs.com)
Date: 08/05/03

  • Next message: Sebastian Krahmer: "[Full-Disclosure] SuSE Security Announcement: postfix (SuSE-SA:2003:033)"
    To: "gyrniff" <b240503@gyrniff.dk>
    Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 05:08:27 +0530
    
    

     1. Is this behavior normal for a windows server installation ?
    i think that this behavour is normal bcoz as u analyse that session u will get to know that server is trying to update something

     2. Could this behavior be considered as a violation of privacy ?
    this surely a case of violation of privacy as it is not mentioned in agreement. go ahead, sue micro$oft.

     3. Could it be considered as a security risk to let a newly installed server,
     request information from an arbitrary server that I have no control over ?
    yes its a security risk bcoz it is not even using pki to establish identity of the server.

    Gaurav Kumar

    Chief Information Security Analyst
    E2 Labs Information Security Pvt. Ltd.
    Hyderbad-34
    AP
    India

    Phone(s)-
    Mobile +91 40 31068650
    Tele/Fax +91 40 23555942 (ext-24)
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "gyrniff" <b240503@gyrniff.dk>
    To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com>
    Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 3:27 PM
    Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Microsoft win2003server phone home

    > After acquiring and installing a copy of 'Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition
    > 180-Day Evaluation' I walked through the 'role wizard', used the 'custom
    > role config' and selected everything ;-)
    > After reboot the server made two POST request to microsoft controlled
    > webserveres without any notification. One request to activex.micrisoft.com
    > and one to codecs.microsoft.com, the data posted to the two severs was the
    > same. (See the request and responds below.)
    >
    > I can find no information in the license agreement about giving away
    > 'information' behind my back.
    >
    > My question:
    > 1. Is this behavior normal for a windows server installation ?
    > 2. Could this behavior be considered as a violation of privacy ?
    > 3. Could it be considered as a security risk to let a newly installed server,
    > request information from an arbitrary server that I have no control over ?
    >
    > ****
    >
    > Posted data to activex.microsoft.com:
    > POST /objects/ocget.dll HTTP/1.1
    > Accept: application/x-cabinet-win32-x86, application/x-pe-win32-x86,
    > application/octet-stream, application/x-setupscript, */*
    > Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
    > Accept-Language: da
    > Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
    > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR
    > 1.1.4322)
    > Host: activex.microsoft.com
    > Content-Length: 44
    > Connection: Keep-Alive
    > Cache-Control: no-cache
    >
    > CLSID={FC7D9E02-3F9E-11D3-93C0-00C04F72DAF7}
    >
    > The reply:
    > HTTP/1.1 404 Object Not Found
    > Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0
    > Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 09:48:38 GMT
    > Connection: close
    > Content-Type: text/html
    > Content-Length: 102
    >
    > <html><head><title>Error</title></head><body>The system cannot find the file
    > specified. </body></html>
    >
    > ***
    >
    > Postede data to codecs.microsoft.com
    > POST /isapi/ocget.dll HTTP/1.1
    > Accept: application/x-cabinet-win32-x86, application/x-pe-win32-x86,
    > application/octet-stream, application/x-setupscript, */*
    > Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
    > Accept-Language: da
    > Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
    > User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR
    > 1.1.4322)
    > Host: codecs.microsoft.com
    > Content-Length: 44
    > Connection: Keep-Alive
    > Cache-Control: no-cache
    >
    > CLSID={FC7D9E02-3F9E-11D3-93C0-00C04F72DAF7}
    >
    > And the reply:
    > HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
    > Connection: close
    > Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 09:47:54 GMT
    > Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
    > P3P: policyref="http://www.microsoft.com/w3c/p3p.xml" CP="ALL IND DSP COR ADM
    > CONo CUR CUSo IVAo IVDo PSA PSD TAI TELo OUR SAMo CNT COM INT NAV ONL PHY PRE
    > PUR UNI"
    > X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
    >
    >
    > /Gyrniff
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    >

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  • Next message: Sebastian Krahmer: "[Full-Disclosure] SuSE Security Announcement: postfix (SuSE-SA:2003:033)"

    Relevant Pages

    • [REVS] NTLM HTTP Authentication is Insecure By Design
      ... in front of a web server, and that proxy server shares a single TCP ... These are attacks that make use of non-RFC HTTP requests (HTTP Request ... the authentication is associated with the ...
      (Securiteam)
    • [NT] 04WebServer Multiple Vulnerabilities (CSS, Log File Injection, AUX DoS)
      ... 04WebServer is a HTTP server developed by Soft3304 for Windows platforms. ... Characters into Log File ... filtering on the request URL before writing it into the log file. ... following HTTP request, when submitted to a vulnerable 04WebServer, will ...
      (Securiteam)
    • Re: breaking the model
      ... > The forms data then is in the Request object. ... HTTP Request; in this case, the form POST Request from the Page. ... client and server. ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
    • Re: Anonymous Anonymity - Request For Comments
      ... > and request that you reply directly to my e-mail address. ... > for the entity wishing to preserve their anonymity. ... > the machine can perform as a Intermediary Server and / or as a Intermediary ... > The software then attempts connection to a Intermediary Server. ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • Re: BASIC authentication Issues with IE - Part II - Solved but WHY?
      ... We have complete control of the Request and Response ... it is up to the browser to send the credentials. ... ASP runs internally on the server. ...
      (microsoft.public.inetserver.iis.security)

  • Quantcast