RE: [Full-Disclosure] Patching networks redux
From: Schmehl, Paul L (pauls_at_utdallas.edu)
Date: 07/31/03
- Previous message: Jordan Wiens: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] DCOM RPC exploit IDS rule?"
- Maybe in reply to: Schmehl, Paul L: "[Full-Disclosure] Patching networks redux"
- Next in thread: John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Patching networks redux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:06:53 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason [mailto:security@brvenik.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:34 PM
> To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Patching networks redux
>
> Please do not forget that the "experts" are not nearly as troubled by
> this because the problem was largly mitigated by following best
> practices. I suspect you too could be spending this time
> appropriately
> handling the problem cases and systems that required the
> functionality
> with a lot less worry and headache.
>
And I'm sitting here wondering how you got the impression that I haven't
already done that?
Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Jordan Wiens: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] DCOM RPC exploit IDS rule?"
- Maybe in reply to: Schmehl, Paul L: "[Full-Disclosure] Patching networks redux"
- Next in thread: John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Patching networks redux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
