RE: [Full-Disclosure] OT but related.
John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk
Date: 07/30/03
- Previous message: morning_wood: "[Full-Disclosure] DCOM RPC - DEVESTATING IN SCOPE"
- Maybe in reply to: Darren Reed: "[Full-Disclosure] OT but related."
- Next in thread: John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] OT but related."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:34:32 +0100
Your questions are intriguing. Anyone who answers the first yes can't answer
any of the others.
I subscribed to bugtraq before this list was created. Then it was bought up
and posts started getting dropped. My own posts were dropped without reason
(in some cases they cleared up FUD, which is therefore clearly not a
priority for the new owner).
I've observed recently that some of the posts that make it to this list are
appearing on bugtraq too. So I'm having to delete the same rubbish twice in
some cases.
What I'm finding annoying though is that somehow there is cross-posting
between the lists, such that I receive at least six copies of every Red Hat
security notice, when I should only receive two.
-
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey@rnib.org.uk
The trouble with post-modernism isn't just that no-one actually believes in
it, but no-one can believe in it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Reed [mailto:avalon@caligula.anu.edu.au]
> Sent: 29 July 2003 18:34
> To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] OT but related.
>
>
>
> I'm curious to know, does anyone subscribe to full-disclosure BUT NOT
> bugtraq ? Is there any material that currently appears on
> bugtraq that
> never appears on full-disclosure ? Is there anything that owners of
> full-disclsoure could do to bridge that gap, if it exists ?
>
> My personal current evaluation of the two lists is tending
> towards bugtraq
> being irrelevant, these days as it becomes more of a
> vendor-announce list
> (especially for Linux) than a useful forum to particpate in.
>
> Cheers,
> Darren
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
system.
RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: morning_wood: "[Full-Disclosure] DCOM RPC - DEVESTATING IN SCOPE"
- Maybe in reply to: Darren Reed: "[Full-Disclosure] OT but related."
- Next in thread: John.Airey_at_rnib.org.uk: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] OT but related."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
