Re: [Full-Disclosure] Avoiding being a good admin - was DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)
From: Larry W. Cashdollar (lwc_at_vapid.ath.cx)
Date: 07/29/03
- Previous message: Andy Wood: "[Full-Disclosure] Dcom.c - (Shutting it down on 5,000 systems) - a Paul Schmehl Post"
- In reply to: Scott M. Algatt: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Avoiding being a good admin - was DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)"
- Next in thread: Michal Zalewski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Avoiding being a good admin - was DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:30:25 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Scott M. Algatt wrote:
> There are other methods of doing patches as well. I know of one company,
> PatchLink, that does a deployment. You simply install the client software
> on a system and then it checks into the master server.
You could also look at ximiam.org's Red Carpet Product. This does the
same thing.
-- Larry C$
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Andy Wood: "[Full-Disclosure] Dcom.c - (Shutting it down on 5,000 systems) - a Paul Schmehl Post"
- In reply to: Scott M. Algatt: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Avoiding being a good admin - was DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)"
- Next in thread: Michal Zalewski: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Avoiding being a good admin - was DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
