Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?
From: Nexus (nexus_at_patrol.i-way.co.uk)
Date: 07/21/03
- Previous message: Linus Sjöberg: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- In reply to: Pamela Patterson: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Next in thread: martin f krafft: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:08:10 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pamela Patterson" <ppatters@cbnco.com>
[snip]
> Spamassasin deducts a couple of points from the Spam Score of a message
> if it's PGP signed. It wouln't surprise me if other spam filters do as
> well.
Which doesn't go far when (for example, SA) still gives a score in the
twenties because of the headers and that nasty html stuff.
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Linus Sjöberg: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- In reply to: Pamela Patterson: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Next in thread: martin f krafft: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]