Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?
From: Justin Mason (jm_at_jmason.org)
Date: 07/21/03
- Previous message: tcpdumb: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Maybe in reply to: KF: "[Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Next in thread: Brian Hatch: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Pamela Patterson <ppatters@cbnco.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:22:58 -0700
Pamela Patterson writes:
>On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 13:54, KF wrote:
>> Has anyone noticed alot of spam coming in recently with pgp sigs
>> attached? What would be the benefit of doing that?
>
>Spamassasin deducts a couple of points from the Spam Score of a message
>if it's PGP signed. It wouln't surprise me if other spam filters do as
>well.
Yeah, it used to. Not any more, though, since it's being exploited.
If you check, often those PGP sigs are the same cut-and-pasted string
btw...
--j.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: tcpdumb: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Maybe in reply to: KF: "[Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Next in thread: Brian Hatch: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
