[Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?
From: martin f krafft (madduck_at_madduck.net)
Date: 07/21/03
- Previous message: Pamela Patterson: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- In reply to: KF: "[Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Next in thread: Jedi/Sector One: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Reply: Jedi/Sector One: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Maybe reply: Justin Mason: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:46:45 +0200
also sprach KF <dotslash@snosoft.com> [2003.07.21.1954 +0200]:
> Has anyone noticed alot of spam coming in recently with pgp sigs
> attached? What would be the benefit of doing that?
Bypassing spamfilters, like spamassassin.
-- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Pamela Patterson: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- In reply to: KF: "[Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Next in thread: Jedi/Sector One: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Reply: Jedi/Sector One: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Maybe reply: Justin Mason: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|