Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?
From: Kresten Kjeldgaard (gathond_at_gathond.dk)
Date: 07/21/03
- Previous message: Florian Huber: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- In reply to: KF: "[Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Next in thread: security snot: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:46:35 +0200
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:54:11PM -0400, KF wrote:
> Has anyone noticed alot of spam coming in recently with pgp sigs
> attached? What would be the benefit of doing that?
>
I would guess most spamfilters has a tendency to let signed mails
through, I think spamassassin give negative points for that, others
might do the same.
-- Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards Kresten Kjeldgaard aka Gathond For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. -- H. L. Mencken
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Florian Huber: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- In reply to: KF: "[Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Next in thread: security snot: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] SPAM with a PGP signature?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|