Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER
From: northern snowfall (dbailey27_at_ameritech.net)
Date: 07/20/03
- Previous message: Philip Stortz: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Odd Behavior - Windows Messenger Service"
- In reply to: mattmurphy_at_kc.rr.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Next in thread: Jeremiah Cornelius: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Reply: Jeremiah Cornelius: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: mattmurphy@kc.rr.com Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 13:28:06 -0500
>
>
>You can't compare VIM and Windows, that is comparing two things with
>entirely different reaches and purposes.
>
That is the very point everyone has been trying to make to you. If you admit
this you must admit that the guidlines they're governed by, relative to
security, must be different. Thus, you negate your own argument.
Don
http://www.7f.no-ip.com/~north_
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Philip Stortz: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Odd Behavior - Windows Messenger Service"
- In reply to: mattmurphy_at_kc.rr.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Next in thread: Jeremiah Cornelius: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Reply: Jeremiah Cornelius: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]