Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER
Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu
Date: 07/15/03
- Previous message: Stephen Clowater: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- In reply to: Raj Mathur: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Next in thread: Stephen Clowater: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Raj Mathur <raju@linux-delhi.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:30:08 -0400
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:46:20 +0530, Raj Mathur <raju@linux-delhi.org> said:
> Am I the only one who finds the phrase `limited full disclosure' an
> oxymoron?
Not at all. They mean "full disclosure of a limited subset of problems - preferably
those of other vendors".... ;)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Stephen Clowater: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- In reply to: Raj Mathur: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Next in thread: Stephen Clowater: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|