Re: [Full-Disclosure] GUNINSKI THE SELF-PROMOTER

From: Raj Mathur (raju_at_linux-delhi.org)
Date: 07/15/03

  • Next message: Len Rose: "[Full-Disclosure] [anonymous: RE: Insecurity of Web-based Feedback Forms]" 
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:46:20 +0530

    >>>>> "dhtml" == dhtml <dhtml@hush.com> writes:

        dhtml> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/PrintStory.pl?document_id=135262788&zsection_id=268448455&slug=softwarebugs14&date=20030714

        dhtml> Hackers, software companies feud over disclosure of
        dhtml> weaknesses

        dhtml> [snip]

        dhtml> Those in Smith's camp back a model of limited full
        dhtml> disclosure.

    Am I the only one who finds the phrase `limited full disclosure' an
    oxymoron?

        dhtml> [snip]

    -- Raju 

    -- 
Raj Mathur                raju@kandalaya.org      http://kandalaya.org/
       GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
                      It is the mind that moves
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
  • Next message: Len Rose: "[Full-Disclosure] [anonymous: RE: Insecurity of Web-based Feedback Forms]"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Is the use of since OK here?
      ... Athel Cornish-Bowden schrieb: ... "within 30 days of disclosure" would be the usual form for this sort of statement. ... I can't make up my mind whether "within 30 days since it was disclosed" is actually wrong, but it doesn't sound right to me. ...
      (alt.usage.english)
    • Re: Is the use of since OK here?
      ... Shouldn't it say "within 30 days of/from disclosure"? ... I can't make up my mind whether "within 30 days since it was disclosed" is actually wrong, but it doesn't sound right to me. ...
      (alt.usage.english)