Re: [Full-Disclosure] Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette

From: Shawn McMahon (smcmahon_at_eiv.com)
Date: 06/27/03

  • Next message: Troy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette" 
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:12:24 -0400

    On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu said:
    >
    > That's when you start seeing
    > slash-dot style
    > padding that's there
    > just to make more
    > new lines than original. Now I've got a 50/50 ratio. Barely.

    In fact, the reason I included several links the other day about the kid
    who got busted for being a good samaritan re: other people's open root
    holes was because of the new policy. The last link would have been
    sufficient, but I was afraid to include too few lines. Net result; more
    bandwidth used, no more information imparted. 

    -- 
Shawn McMahon     | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill,
EIV Consulting    | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any
UNIX and Linux	  | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure
http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  • Next message: Troy: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette"