RE: [Full-Disclosure] A worm...

From: ATD (simon_at_snosoft.com)
Date: 06/26/03

  • Next message: ATD: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A worm..."
    To: "Richard M. Smith" <rms@computerbytesman.com>
    Date: 26 Jun 2003 11:17:30 -0400
    
    
    

    Yes,
            But we all know that IE caters to the lazy people in each of us. =]

    On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 09:43, Richard M. Smith wrote:
    > Hi Peter,
    >
    > Thanks for the background info. Because of the password issue, any
    > security protections for .ZIP files need to be built into a unzipper
    > program. As a minimum, Microsoft needs to put a warning dialog in the
    > Windows unzipper when double-clicking on an executable file in a .ZIP
    > file that comes attached to an email message. Better yet, don't allow
    > .ZIP files to be opened from an email message. Force people to save
    > them first. Netscape had this second basic protection scheme in
    > Communicator years ago.
    >
    > Richard
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
    > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Peter Kruse
    > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:57 AM
    > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    > Subject: SV: [Full-Disclosure] A worm...
    >
    >
    > Hi Richard,
    >
    > Well, it might be the first wide-spread of itīs kind but itīs certainly
    > not the first to use zip to hide itself. Also itīs trendy to put
    > malicious code inside the new rar format and spread it. I suppose itīs
    > fairly easy to write a worm that packs itself with a random password and
    > inserts this into a e-mail sent to the victim. This way it will pass
    > most AV-gateway scanners since they won't have access to scan inside the
    > zipe archive.
    >
    > Also XP is quite vulnerable to this type of trick. If you attach a zip
    > file and opens it open a Windows XP to build in zip-feature will open
    > the zipped file in a new window from where the user can active the
    > malicious directly without unziping the files :-(
    >
    > Others that have used the zip trick is bogusbear. A search on google
    > will give you plenty hits.
    >
    > I diod write a article about this back in October 2002. Unfortunately
    > itīs in Danish so many of you guys won't understand a word. Anyways, I
    > pointed out that this would be used in future malicious code and so it
    > happened - I guess I got "lucky".
    > http://www.comon.dk/index.php?page=news:show,id=12315
    >
    > Med venlig hilsen // Kind regards
    >
    > Peter Kruse
    > Kruse Security
    > http://www.krusesecurity.dk
    >
    >
    >
    > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
    > > Fra: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
    > > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] På vegne af
    > > Richard M. Smith
    > > Sendt: 26. juni 2003 13:55
    > > Til: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    > > Emne: RE: [Full-Disclosure] A worm...
    > >
    > >
    > > This is the first worm that I am aware of that hides itself
    > > inside of a .ZIP file. This trick prevents the worm
    > > executable from being deleted by the Outlook Security Update.
    > > Looks like Microsoft will need to now think about how to
    > > deal with malicous code inside of attached .ZIP files.
    > > Outlook 2002 does provide a security warning when opening the
    > > .ZIP file. But everyone knows that .ZIP files are safe,
    > > right? I don't believe there is any security warning when
    > > running the .PIF file inside of the .ZIP, but I didn't try
    > > this particular experiment. ;-)
    > >
    > > Richard
    > >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
    > > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com] On Behalf Of KF
    > > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:11 PM
    > > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    > > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] A worm...
    > >
    > >
    > > I believe Simon is well aware of what virus this is... the
    > > question was
    > > in relation to the zipping of the payload. I believe he was
    > > wondering if
    > >
    > > this (zipping of payload) was some new Antivirus evasion trick or if
    > > there was something more to it (like simply hoping a retarded
    > > user would
    > >
    > > unzip and run the .pif).
    > >
    > > >>I know what it is, but since when did the pif worm start zipping
    > > itself?
    > > >>did I miss something?
    > > >>
    > > -KF
    > >
    > >
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    > >
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    > >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

    
    

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



  • Next message: ATD: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] A worm..."

    Relevant Pages