Re: [Dshield] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windows Messenger Popup Spam on UDP Port 1026
From: Dietmar Goldbeck (dietmar.goldbeck_at_acm.org)
To: General DShield Discussion List <email@example.com> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 21:41:18 +0200
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 01:14:25PM -0400, Johannes Ullrich wrote:
> Well, blocking port 1026 is probably not such a great idea. But
> why would a non-windows user suffer if port 135-139 & 445 is blocked?
I really don't want my ISP to disallow the use of Samba across
Internet connections. If i have to serve documents to windows users,
(of course i would prefer samba over a vpn, or some other encrypted
file transfer protocol like sftp or webDAV/https).
If ISPs start blocking ports, i would vote for tcp/25.
People should not be allowed to run smtp servers, unless
they have proven knowledge in the relevant RFCs. :-))
-- Alles Gute / best wishes Dietmar Goldbeck E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Reporter (to Mahatma Gandhi): Mr Gandhi, what do you think of Western Civilization? Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html