[Full-Disclosure] Re: Full-Disclosure digest, Vol 1 #883 - 11 msgs

From: Rodrigo Gutierrez (packet_at_vtr.net)
Date: 06/12/03

  • Next message: noconflic: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES"
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    Date: 12 Jun 2003 11:13:53 +0200
    
    

    We all agree that oner person is no1 when it comes to change the law of
    different countries, however the FoI you mention allow us to share our
    views, get united and perhaps do something about it later on.

    It would be just stupid me jumping outside congress, pretending them to
    the law.

    Rgds

    Rod.-

    On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 02:32, full-disclosure-request@lists.netsys.com
    wrote:
    > Send Full-Disclosure mailing list submissions to
    > full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    >
    > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    > http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
    > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    > full-disclosure-request@lists.netsys.com
    >
    > You can reach the person managing the list at
    > full-disclosure-admin@lists.netsys.com
    >
    > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    > than "Re: Contents of Full-Disclosure digest..."
    >
    >
    > Today's Topics:
    >
    > 1. Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES (Klaw)
    > 2. MDKSA-2003:066 - Updated kernel packages fix multiple vulnerabilities (Mandrake Linux Security Team)
    > 3. Re: Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES (sockz loves you)
    > 4. iDEFENSE Security Advisory 06.11.03: Denial of Service Vulnerability in SMC Networks' Barricade Wireless Router (iDEFENSE Labs)
    > 5. Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES (martin f krafft)
    > 6. Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES (martin f krafft)
    > 7. Re: Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES (Darren Reed)
    > 8. Re: Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES (morning_wood)
    > 9. [SECURITY] [DSA-309-2] New eterm packages fix error introduced in DSA-309-1 (debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org)
    > 10. [SECURITY] [DSA-313-1] New ethereal packages fix buffer overflows, integer overflows (debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org)
    > 11. [SECURITY] [DSA-314-1] New atftp packages fix buffer overflow (debian-security-announce@lists.debian.org)
    >
    > --__--__--
    >
    > Message: 1
    > Date: 11 Jun 2003 14:21:05 -0300
    > From: "Klaw" <klaw@jogos.net>
    > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES
    >
    > Hi every body,
    >
    > 1st of all, sorry for my poor english, but ill try to make myself as clear as possible.
    >
    > About the topic, thats very funny that none of the "DOJs defensors" (its in quotes couse what i want to mean is the ppl that is defending the way USA Gov thinks) talked about what fbi and cia does, hacking into everybodys accounts. Secondly, how come you say that:
    >
    > "Kidnapping is illegal, but apprehending criminals and putting them in jail is not repellent."
    >
    > What about a President killing milions of inocent ppl claiming thats becouse they have chemical weapon in theier country when 75% of the rest of world was claiming him not to do it ? Criminal depends on the point of view!!! How come the DOJs say:
    > "What is privacy worth to you? What information about you (or your parents) do you think is private: medical information? grades? how much money you have? how much money you owe? your letters to a friend? To a boyfriend or girlfriend?"
    > When they r the first to get into (or HACK into) your privacy stuff just to be sure that u arent doing what they dont want u to do.
    >
    > cmon guys... please lets open our eyes to the real truth. They want to manipulate and do BRAIN WASHING yes!!! we all know it.
    >
    > Its not interesting to inform and clarify the minds, so they take conclusion from theyer selfs. Its much better to "inser" info and tell u to obey.
    >
    > I, personally, dont think it has a solution, but, trying to justify what is "unjustfiable" is worthless.
    >
    > klaw
    >
    > KLAW
    > klaw@jogos.net
    >
    >
    > --__--__--
    >
    > Message: 2
    > Date: 11 Jun 2003 21:56:14 -0000
    > From: Mandrake Linux Security Team <security@linux-mandrake.com>
    > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] MDKSA-2003:066 - Updated kernel packages fix multiple vulnerabilities
    >
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    > Hash: SHA1
    >
    > ________________________________________________________________________
    >
    > Mandrake Linux Security Update Advisory
    > ________________________________________________________________________
    >
    > Package name: kernel
    > Advisory ID: MDKSA-2003:066
    > Date: June 11th, 2003
    >
    > Affected versions: 9.1
    > ________________________________________________________________________
    >
    > Problem Description:
    >
    > Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered and fixed in the Linux kernel.
    >
    > * CAN-2003-0001: Multiple ethernet network card drivers do not pad
    > frames with null bytes which allows remote attackers to obtain
    > information from previous packets or kernel memory by using
    > special malformed packets.
    >
    > * CAN-2003-0244: The route cache implementation in the 2.4 kernel and
    > the Netfilter IP conntrack module allows remote attackers to cause a
    > Denial of Service (DoS) via CPU consumption due to packets with
    > forged source addresses that cause a large number of hash table
    > collisions related to the PREROUTING chain.
    >
    > * CAN-2003-0246: The ioperm implementation in 2.4.20 and earlier
    > kernels does not properly restrict privileges, which allows local
    > users to gain read or write access to certain I/O ports.
    >
    > * CAN-2003-0247: A vulnerability in the TTY layer of the 2.4 kernel
    > allows attackers to cause a kernel oops resulting in a DoS.
    >
    > * CAN-2003-0248: The mxcsr code in the 2.4 kernel allows attackers to
    > modify CPU state registers via a malformed address.
    >
    > As well, a number of bug fixes were made in the 9.1 kernel including:
    >
    > * Support for more machines that did not work with APIC
    > * Audigy2 support
    > * New/updated modules: prims25, adiusbadsl, thinkpad, ieee1394,
    > orinoco, via-rhine,
    > * Fixed SiS IOAPIC
    > * IRQ balancing has been fixed for SMP
    > * Updates to ext3
    > * The previous ptrace fix has been redone to work better
    >
    > MandrakeSoft encourages all users to upgrade to these new kernels.
    > Updated kernels will be available shortly for other supported platforms
    > and architectures.
    > ________________________________________________________________________
    >
    > References:
    >
    > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0001
    > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0244
    > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0246
    > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0247
    > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0248
    > ________________________________________________________________________
    >
    > Updated Packages:
    >
    > Mandrake Linux 9.1:
    > bca5bada0476e53911f157e9ec5ca504 9.1/RPMS/kernel-2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
    > 57ee4b2b038598cbd020f1e0752a61dd 9.1/RPMS/kernel-BOOT-2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
    > b14c3291fab83bd1894c8b5217311dfa 9.1/RPMS/kernel-doc-2.4.21-0.18mdk.i586.rpm
    > ed766922171751e1f05c6ce590af9755 9.1/RPMS/kernel-enterprise-2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
    > 64c554564115626ff86cf3fd5e40ece1 9.1/RPMS/kernel-secure-2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
    > 944017f71e79714767d94517cd41110d 9.1/RPMS/kernel-smp-2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
    > 9621bebecb94bc6031ffaa073c4967f1 9.1/RPMS/kernel-source-2.4.21-0.18mdk.i586.rpm
    > 9d0c651808a2874256489f3a90ad6fdb 9.1/SRPMS/kernel-2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1mdk.src.rpm
    > ________________________________________________________________________
    >
    > Bug IDs fixed (see https://qa.mandrakesoft.com for more information):
    > ________________________________________________________________________
    >
    > To upgrade automatically, use MandrakeUpdate. The verification of md5
    > checksums and GPG signatures is performed automatically for you.
    >
    > If you want to upgrade manually, download the updated package from one
    > of our FTP server mirrors and upgrade with "rpm -Fvh *.rpm". A list of
    > FTP mirrors can be obtained from:
    >
    > http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/ftp.php
    >
    > Please verify the update prior to upgrading to ensure the integrity of
    > the downloaded package. You can do this with the command:
    >
    > rpm --checksig <filename>
    >
    > All packages are signed by MandrakeSoft for security. You can obtain
    > the GPG public key of the Mandrake Linux Security Team from:
    >
    > https://www.mandrakesecure.net/RPM-GPG-KEYS
    >
    > Please be aware that sometimes it takes the mirrors a few hours to
    > update.
    >
    > You can view other update advisories for Mandrake Linux at:
    >
    > http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/
    >
    > MandrakeSoft has several security-related mailing list services that
    > anyone can subscribe to. Information on these lists can be obtained by
    > visiting:
    >
    > http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/mlist.php
    >
    > If you want to report vulnerabilities, please contact
    >
    > security_linux-mandrake.com
    >
    > Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID
    > pub 1024D/22458A98 2000-07-10 Linux Mandrake Security Team
    > <security linux-mandrake.com>
    >
    > - -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
    > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
    >
    > mQGiBDlp594RBAC2tDozI3ZgQsE7XwxurJCJrX0L5vx7SDByR5GHDdWekGhdiday
    > L4nfUax+SeR9SCoCgTgPW1xB8vtQc8/sinJlMjp9197a2iKM0FOcPlkpa3HcOdt7
    > WKJqQhlMrHvRcsivzcgqjH44GBBJIT6sygUF8k0lU6YnMHj5MPc/NGWt8wCg9vKo
    > P0l5QVAFSsHtqcU9W8cc7wMEAJzQsAlnvPXDBfBLEH6u7ptWFdp0GvbSuG2wRaPl
    > hynHvRiE01ZvwbJZXsPsKm1z7uVoW+NknKLunWKB5axrNXDHxCYJBzY3jTeFjsqx
    > PFZkIEAQphLTkeXXelAjQ5u9tEshPswEtMvJvUgNiAfbzHfPYmq8D6x5xOw1IySg
    > 2e/LBACxr2UJYCCB2BZ3p508mAB0RpuLGukq+7UWiOizy+kSskIBg2O7sQkVY/Cs
    > iyGEo4XvXqZFMY39RBdfm2GY+WB/5NFiTOYJRKjfprP6K1YbtsmctsX8dG+foKsD
    > LLFs7OuVfaydLQYp1iiN6D+LJDSMPM8/LCWzZsgr9EKJ8NXiyrQ6TGludXggTWFu
    > ZHJha2UgU2VjdXJpdHkgVGVhbSA8c2VjdXJpdHlAbGludXgtbWFuZHJha2UuY29t
    > PohWBBMRAgAWBQI5aefeBAsKBAMDFQMCAxYCAQIXgAAKCRCaqNDQIkWKmK6LAKCy
    > /NInDsaMSI+WHwrquwC5PZrcnQCeI+v3gUDsNfQfiKBvQSANu1hdulqIRgQQEQIA
    > BgUCOtNVGQAKCRBZ5w3um0pAJJWQAKDUoL5He+mKbfrMaTuyU5lmRyJ0fwCgoFAP
    > WdvQlu/kFjphF740XeOwtOqIRgQQEQIABgUCOu8A6QAKCRBynDnb9lq3CnpjAJ4w
    > Pk0SEE9U4r40IxWpwLU+wrWVugCdFfSPllPpZRCiaC7HwbFcfExRmPaIRgQQEQIA
    > BgUCPI+UAwAKCRDniYrgcHcf8xK5AKCm/Mq8qP8GE0o1hEX22QsJMZwH5gCfZ72H
    > 8TacOb3oAmBdprf+K6gkdOiIRgQQEQIABgUCOtOieAAKCRCv2bZyU0yB80MeAJ9K
    > +jXt0cKuaUonRU+CRGetk6t9dgCfTRRL6/puOKdD6md70+K5EBBSvsG0OE1hbmRy
    > YWtlIExpbnV4IFNlY3VyaXR5IFRlYW0gPHNlY3VyaXR5QG1hbmRyYWtlc29mdC5j
    > b20+iFcEExECABcFAjyPnuUFCwcKAwQDFQMCAxYCAQIXgAAKCRCaqNDQIkWKmFi+
    > AJsHhohgnU3ik4+gy3EdFlB2i/MBoACg6lHn5cnVvTcmgNccWxeNxLLZI5e5AQ0E
    > OWnn7xAEAOQlTVY4TiNo5V/iP0J1xnqjqlqZsU7yEBKo/gZz6/+hx75RURe1ebiJ
    > 9F779FQbpJ9Epz1KLSXvq974rnVb813zuGdmgFyk+ryA/rTR2RQ8h+EoNkwmATzR
    > xBXVJb57fFQjxOu4eNjZAtfII/YXb0uyXXrdr5dlJ/3eXrcO4p0XAAMFBACCxo6Z
    > 269s+A4v8C6Ui12aarOQcCDlV8cVG9LkyatU3FNTlnasqwo6EkaP572448weJWwN
    > 6SCXVl+xOYLiK0hL/6Jb/O9Agw75yUVdk+RMM2I4fNEi+y4hmfMh2siBv8yEkEvZ
    > jTcl3TpkTfzYky85tu433wmKaLFOv0WjBFSikohGBBgRAgAGBQI5aefvAAoJEJqo
    > 0NAiRYqYid0AoJgeWzXrEdIClBOSW5Q6FzqJJyaqAKC0Y9YI3UFlE4zSIGjcFlLJ
    > EJGXlA==
    > =yGlX
    > - -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
    >
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
    >
    > iD8DBQE+56V+mqjQ0CJFipgRAu0bAJsElc3QmEl4WBRhUO7PNwit3HAjrwCfSClk
    > 972cH4+NoFhTz+l8rQg1o88=
    > =rOjs
    > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    >
    > --__--__--
    >
    > Message: 3
    > From: "sockz loves you" <sockz@email.com>
    > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:10:33 -0100
    > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Klaw" <klaw@jogos.net>
    > Date: 11 Jun 2003 14:21:05 -0300
    > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
    > Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES
    >
    > > About the topic, thats very funny that none of the "DOJs defensors" (its
    > > in quotes couse what i want to mean is the ppl that is defending the way USA
    > > Gov thinks) talked about what fbi and cia does, hacking into everybodys
    > > accounts. Secondly, how come you say that:
    > >
    > > "Kidnapping is illegal, but apprehending criminals and putting them in jail
    > > is not repellent."
    > >
    > > What about a President killing milions of inocent ppl claiming thats becouse
    > > they have chemical weapon in theier country when 75% of the rest of world was
    > > claiming him not to do it ? Criminal depends on the point of view!!! How come
    > > the DOJs say:
    >
    > i agree entirely. when hackers start to kill millions of people, maybe THEN
    > can we turn around and say "okay, its illegal". the governments of our nations
    > commit far worse crimes on a daily basis than we do as citizens. citizens who
    > are concerned about their civil rights, or are naturally curious about the
    > world around them. this is why hacking should be decriminalised. its a white
    > collar crime that wouldn't even be an issue if it weren't for corporations
    > whining about losing money. okay sure, there have been a few major digital
    > protests in the past, but how are these different from real life demonstrations?
    > is not resistance, freedom of information, and activism a fundamental right of
    > being human? this is no more the DOJ's world than it is my world, so why should
    > there be a different set of rules for Government and People?
    >
    > > I, personally, dont think it has a solution, but, trying to justify what is
    > > "unjustfiable" is worthless.
    >
    > exactly
    >
    > oh and darren, no i wasn't joking about encouraging the young hacker to develop
    > his skills. its a legitimate option.
    >
    > enuff from me now ;\
    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  • Next message: noconflic: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] USDOJ BRAINWASHING TECHNIQUES"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 2.6 kernel upgrade gives garbled video (w/o X11)
      ... the Etch packages because of a dependency loop involving libc6. ... not passing any special kernel parameters on boot to the 2.4 kernel ... I was getting this error when trying to upgrade the ... update and then try installing the 2.6 kernel package again? ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: [opensuse] Architecture switch 32->64 bit (i386 to x86-64)
      ... A "simple" upgrade with Yast from 10.3 installmedia leads to lots of dependency problems when resolving the packages. ... I wanted to get my kernel to 64-bits. ... One rpm line shows 55 rpm packages I had to install at same ...
      (SuSE)
    • [CLA-2005:945] Conectiva Security Announcement - kernel
      ... SUMMARY: Kernel fixes ... Race condition in the Radeon DRI driver for Linux kernel 2.6.8.1 ... UPDATED PACKAGES ... - after that, execute: apt-get upgrade ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • Re: change description on kernel-image packages?
      ... depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on 32bit AMD ... will cause your kernel to be upgraded when you upgrade your system, ... the kernel is special and kernel-image packages ... later when he was no longer a true newbie. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • unsubscribe
      ... > Subject: debian newbie... ... If I need to recompile the kernel, ... Also, what other additional packages, ... >> The package you're trying to install presumably ...
      (Debian-User)