Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list...
From: Cedric Blancher (blancher_at_cartel-securite.fr)
Date: 05/27/03
- Previous message: Paul Szabo: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Eudora 5.2.1 attachment spoof"
- In reply to: morning_wood: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list..."
- Next in thread: Nick Jacobsen: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list..."
- Maybe reply: Anthony Aykut: "RE: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list..."
- Reply: Nick Jacobsen: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: morning_wood <se_cur_ity@hotmail.com> Date: 27 May 2003 08:13:20 +0200
Le mar 27/05/2003 à 01:34, morning_wood a écrit :
> Mail is private until read, just because its labled as "mail" does not
> imply land based mail laws in whatever country you are in apply.
In France, jurisprudence tends to treat email exactly as common mail in
terms of privacy. Thus, according to this, you should not forward
private email without explicit sender's authorization as an example.
-- Cédric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr> IT systems and networks security - Cartel Sécurité Phone : +33 (0)1 44 06 97 87 - Fax: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 99 PGP KeyID:157E98EE FingerPrint:FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Paul Szabo: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: Eudora 5.2.1 attachment spoof"
- In reply to: morning_wood: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list..."
- Next in thread: Nick Jacobsen: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list..."
- Maybe reply: Anthony Aykut: "RE: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list..."
- Reply: Nick Jacobsen: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Fw: A question for the list..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]