Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off
From: J G (sixsigma98_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 04/27/03
- Previous message: Greg Steuck: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Windows Server 2003 Security Guide available"
- Maybe in reply to: Tamer Sahin: "Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Next in thread: Steve Wray: "RE: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Reply: Steve Wray: "RE: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: full-disclosure@netsys.com Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:22:50 +0000
No, no, no. Read the End User License Agreement. Every one I have read says
the vulnerabilities belong to the licensee (user) of the software, never the
people that put them there.
Ray
>I thought vulnerabilities belonged to people who were writing vulnerable
>softwares...
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Greg Steuck: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Windows Server 2003 Security Guide available"
- Maybe in reply to: Tamer Sahin: "Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Next in thread: Steve Wray: "RE: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Reply: Steve Wray: "RE: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]