Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off

From: badpack3t (badpack3t_at_security-protocols.com)
Date: 04/26/03

  • Next message: adf--at--Code511.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] [k-otik] The French Security List (En Fran çais)"
    To: <ts@securityoffice.net>
    Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:55:51 -0400 (EDT)
    

    Tamer,

    You really are an idiot aren't you.

    >To stress, the
    > vulnerability that Badpack3t has found out is a different vulnerability.

    and then you say:

    >Currently the situation is that;
    > Badpack3t has figured out that he published an advisory on the
    > vulnerability that does not belong to him and I explained the truth.

    I think you need to put that hooka down, and read a little closer. You
    dont own any rights to any vulnerabilities. Is this some new law that you
    just created or am I mistaken? The vendor fixed the bug you found back in
    2002. You need to read the advisory a little closer before you start
    sending our your little bull*** emails about copyright laws and whatnot.

    I think you would be better off just dropping this because your making
    yourself look like a real ass.

    -badpack3t
    www.security-protocols.com

    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    > Hash: SHA1
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I could not understand why this argument keept on this much. I am
    > so busy now a days. I could not find any time to write a response to the
    > maillish back after i recieved the mail from Badpack3t. To stress, the
    > vulnerability that Badpack3t has found out is a different vulnerability.
    >
    > However, the one that Secunia has found out, of which all rights
    > belong to me, is not a acceptable case. Currently the situation is that;
    > Badpack3t has figured out that he published an advisory on the
    > vulnerability that does not belong to him and I explained the truth. he
    > vulnerability the Badpack3t has found out is different one, however, the
    > reaction that he act against secunia is wrong.
    >
    > I wanted to express this.
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > Tamer Sahin
    > http://www.securityoffice.net
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
    >
    > iD8DBQE+qow8gfeC/CdyvS8RAnwxAJ9XHjhI9Bia+IhWEvf5opzPTuWTVACffD4c
    > m3WSr4PwEgpym5+t9blO8qc=
    > =8T7K
    > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  • Next message: adf--at--Code511.com: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] [k-otik] The French Security List (En Fran çais)"
  • Quantcast