Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off
From: Cedric Blancher (blancher_at_cartel-securite.fr)
Date: 04/26/03
- Previous message: Knud Erik Højgaard: "Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- In reply to: Knud Erik Højgaard: "Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Next in thread: Halil Demirezen: "Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Knud Erik Højgaard <kain@ircop.dk> Date: 26 Apr 2003 17:45:32 +0200
Le sam 26/04/2003 à 16:38, Knud Erik Højgaard a écrit :
> Tamer Sahin wrote:
> > However, the one that Secunia has found out, of which all rights
> > belong to me, is not a acceptable case.
> What rights would these be?
> Am I not allowed to write code that expoits it?
> Am I not allowed to talk about it?
> Am I not allowed to claim that I found this hole too?
> If I am not, then what? Are you going to, uh-oh, sue me?
I thought vulnerabilities belonged to people who were writing vulnerable
softwares...
-- Cédric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr> IT systems and networks security - Cartel Sécurité Phone : +33 (0)1 44 06 97 87 - Fax: +33 (0)1 44 06 97 99 PGP KeyID:157E98EE FingerPrint:FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: Knud Erik Højgaard: "Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- In reply to: Knud Erik Højgaard: "Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Next in thread: Halil Demirezen: "Re: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] pissed off"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
