Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenSSL on Fire.
From: Michael Osten (mosten@bleepyou.com)
Date: 03/31/03
- Previous message: FreeBSD Security Advisories: "[Full-Disclosure] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:07.sendmail"
- In reply to: martin f krafft: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenSSL on Fire."
- Next in thread: David Howe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenSSL on Fire."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Michael Osten <mosten@bleepyou.com> To: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> Date: 30 Mar 2003 22:46:31 -0600
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 12:56, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach harden@softhome.net <harden@softhome.net> [2003.03.30.0543 +0200]:
> > As many of you already thought, suicide can be a way out of this
> > uncomfortable position.
>
> [The rest snipped]
>
> I don't have time right now, but my curiosity is up. Has anyone
> looked at what this OpenSSL Uzi shebang is all about?
It is a wrapper for the "openssl-too-open" proof-of-concept that was
released I believe in Jan 02. From just a quick glace it adds to the
original by allowing scanning of class A's instead of just class C's.
Performs web server and OS fingerprinting, and spits out a nice little
victim list. The OpenSSL exploit was a remote non-root, but with the
release of the ptrace exploit code it could get ugly for people that are
*really* irresponsible about patching.
-----------------
Michael Osten
www.bleepyou.com
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Previous message: FreeBSD Security Advisories: "[Full-Disclosure] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:07.sendmail"
- In reply to: martin f krafft: "[Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenSSL on Fire."
- Next in thread: David Howe: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: OpenSSL on Fire."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]