Re: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar
From: Georgi Guninski (guninski@guninski.com)
Date: 01/31/03
- Previous message: madsaxon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Origin of the term "driveby download""
- In reply to: Thor Larholm: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar"
- Next in thread: Richard M. Smith: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar"
- Reply: Richard M. Smith: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@guninski.com> To: Thor Larholm <lists.netsys.com@jscript.dk> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:24:18 +0200
Thor Larholm wrote:
> There is no such thing as a "standard ActiveX drive-by download mechanism",
> that term is utterly FUD.
>
Has m$ fixed the "feature" of installing old buggy activex signed by them?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
- Next message: Richard M. Smith: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: Origin of the term "driveby download""
- Previous message: madsaxon: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Origin of the term "driveby download""
- In reply to: Thor Larholm: "Re: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar"
- Next in thread: Richard M. Smith: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar"
- Reply: Richard M. Smith: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|