Re: [Full-Disclosure] SQL Server patch - why doesn't Windows update help?

From: Curt Wilson (netw3_security@hushmail.com)
Date: 01/30/03

  • Next message: Pipes Cuchifrito: "RE: [Full-Disclosure] The worm author finally revealed!"
    To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com, avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au
    From: "Curt Wilson" <netw3_security@hushmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:44:04 -0800
    

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 07:30:05 -0800 Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> wrote:
    >I was just thinking to myself, hmmm, I have SQL Server something*
    >installed on one of my Win2K boxes (service is turned off), I wonder
    >if I have this patched as I do regular checkups with "Windows Update"...

    Windows Update does not cover SQL Server. You need to use the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer if you are looking for an automated method in this case. MBSA handles a few things that WU does not, for instance SQL Server, and Exchange. Admins sometimes become complacent, thinking that "I run Windows Update and so now I'm secure". WU helps, but is only a piece of the Windows patching pie. MBSA is useful, although I've found that it misreports a variety of items, so you still have to vigilant.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: Hush 2.2 (Java)
    Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify

    wmMEARECACMFAj45ZGIcHG5ldHczX3NlY3VyaXR5QGh1c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRBGd/Yw
    aRH3K8l0AJ42vFGXbNf/UuJLTHMusaCGNILKoACfR6Rn2+ELkyHBxj3kTKNohOTkd60=
    =4Oyu
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    _______________________________________________
    Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
    Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html