[Full-Disclosure] Netscape Problems.

From: Georgi Guninski (guninski@guninski.com)
Date: 11/26/02

From: guninski@guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:34:24 +0200

zen-parse wrote:

> In case people haven't noticed yet, Open Source is not more secure.

Forgot this:

Can someone name a closed source software (besides netscape which is heavily
based on mozilla) who offers a monetary reward for security bugs?
A recent reesarch found the following open source projects:
DJB's qmail - cr.yp.to
some version of TEX IIRC Knuth's, don't have URL right now.

Has m$ has the guts to offer $$$ for crashes? :)

Relevant Pages

  • RSA implementation, please comment.
    ... SYNOPSIS: Is Crypt::RSA secure acceptable in open source if the ... private key password is in a browser cookie? ... The client asked me to devise "a secure way to save credit card ...
  • RE: IIS
    ... I believe that once the source code is open source, ... Subject: IIS ... are a myriad of options to hardening an IIS box than just patches. ... worked with many and would answer this with, the system is as secure as the ...
  • Re: Distributing user-developed Linux software and licensing issues.
    ... that makes almost uncrackable encryption is no secret, ... In this case being open-source is more secure. ... That can be automated to generate the clients ... > Do open source web servers include the full source to ...
  • RE: Why open source software is more secure
    ... OSS hides through obscurity in some ways. ... The arguments assume that OSS with source is the only way to check code. ... Being open source does not necessarily mean more secure - two completely ...
  • How regularly is the GnuPG source code examined?
    ... Sure GnuPG is open source and regarded as being pretty secure, ... Free, anonymous email addresses available! ...