[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass (who's responsible)
From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Date: 10/23/02
- Next message: skyper: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass (who's responsible)"
- Previous message: KF: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass - alleged *BSD remote kernel exploit"
- Next in thread: skyper: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass (who's responsible)"
- Reply: skyper: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass (who's responsible)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com (full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com) Date: 23 Oct 2002 06:16:16 -0000
<funkysh> k
<skyper> wasnt meant to go outside darknet ;)
<ler> heheh maybe we should let everyone run it
<skyper> no.. it will come back to us
<funkysh> i could post a half-assed analysis with warning
<skyper> yes
<skyper> that would be nice
<funkysh> btw, is there a genuine bug like that? :)
<ler> yes
<skyper> im afraid so ;)
<skyper> it isnt as easy to exploit as that trojan appeared
<skyper> a lot more work is involved
<skyper> and its still being perfected ;)
<funkysh> hm
<funkysh> all BSD?
<skyper> yes but only openbsd has been worked on now
<skyper> openbsd also has a pf bug
<funkysh> of?
<funkysh> pf*
<skyper> yes
-- This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at www.no-id.com.
- Next message: skyper: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass (who's responsible)"
- Previous message: KF: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass - alleged *BSD remote kernel exploit"
- Next in thread: skyper: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass (who's responsible)"
- Reply: skyper: "[Full-Disclosure] RE: 7350reass (who's responsible)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]