[Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE Security Advisory 10.02.2002: Net-SNMP DoS Vulnerability
From: Ben Laurie (ben@algroup.co.uk)
Date: 10/04/02
- Next message: Georgi Guninski: "[Full-Disclosure] Hah now this redefines selling out."
- Previous message: bugzilla@redhat.com: "[Full-Disclosure] [RHSA-2002:212-06] Updated packages fix PostScript and PDF security issue"
- In reply to: Orlando: "[Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE Security Advisory 10.02.2002: Net-SNMP DoS Vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: ben@algroup.co.uk (Ben Laurie) Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:44:10 +0100
Orlando wrote:
> Evidently Ben isn't well aware of all the facts. It's ok Ben you're a busy
> guy, I still think iDefense no excuse.
Did I disagree?
Cheers,
Ben.
>
>
> On Thursday 03 October 2002 04:32 pm, Isaak Bloodlore wrote:
>
>>Quoting Ben Laurie (ben@algroup.co.uk):
>>
>>>This is different from, say, CERT, how?
>>
>>Not at all. Has anyone ever taken CERT seriously?
>
>
>
> -x
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
-- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
- Next message: Georgi Guninski: "[Full-Disclosure] Hah now this redefines selling out."
- Previous message: bugzilla@redhat.com: "[Full-Disclosure] [RHSA-2002:212-06] Updated packages fix PostScript and PDF security issue"
- In reply to: Orlando: "[Full-Disclosure] iDEFENSE Security Advisory 10.02.2002: Net-SNMP DoS Vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
