[Full-Disclosure] Re: what's to come chapter 1.

From: zan (zan@stargeek.com)
Date: 09/18/02


From: zan@stargeek.com (zan)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:01:10 -0400

gobbles@hush.com wrote:

>>yes, yes it is.
>>
>>
>
>What point?
>
>
>
>>>I can can't you? Network insecure not FUD - reality. Jealous
>>>
>>>
>>that some cashed in? I am.
>>
>>
>>statements like these were over simplified, and generally engin
>>eered for
>>ultimate FUD factor, to generate nervious-ness, revenue etc.
>>
>>
>
>FUD typically something false - engineered to create panic. Much like entire PHC movement.
>
>
>
>>but no, i'm not much of a hacker so i can't actually.
>>
>>
>
>Then how can you make calls to hackers for action?
>
>
i've not called for anything *yet*

>
>
>>>Information should be free. Hacking is information. Hacking
>>>
>>>
>>not illegal.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>hacking is a verb, information is a noun. if i break a system a
>>nd
>>uncover information best made public on it... *then* i will lib
>>erate it.
>>
>>
>
>Yes but not hacking.
>
>
..explain?

>
>
>>>Unless you sell-out dot-bomb effect nothing
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>that's my point.
>>
>>
>
>My point - those disillusioned burned because they sold out. Do you speak for PHC? Did PHC sell out?
>
>
i do not speak for them. i assumed you were making the assumption that
they sold out.

>
>
>>>look around themselves see missed boat-missed opportunity.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>its debateable, are you saying this is the motivation for the P
>>HC
>>whitehat h8 effect and its pr0j3ct m4yh3m activities?
>>
>>
>
>Why they upset? Did they burn by selling out?
>
>
>
>>>>-Cheat death again-
>>>> d34dh1tl3r <-RIP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Good riddance
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>... elaborate?
>>
>>
>
>happy he gone.
>
>
>
why?

>
>Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
>
>
>
>



Relevant Pages