[Full-Disclosure] RE: SMB overflow attacks

From: John Schutz (full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com)
Date: 08/27/02 

From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com (John Schutz)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:49:11 -0500

Jason Coombs wrote:
> Does anyone have any information about why System binds to a port above
> 1024

I believe the windows task scheduler will bind to a port above 1024.

Relevant Pages

  • [Full-Disclosure] RE: SMB overflow attacks
    ... >Does anyone have any information about why System binds to a port above 1024, ... >stop binding to port 445 TCP and UDP? ... tried the old NetBIOS trick of binding it to the loopback NIC? ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: ZoneAlarm 5.1 leaves port 1025 open
    ... Thanks, Charlie. ... It was the Windows Task Scheduler. ... > to the Internet Zone, but access as server would keep a port open. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
Quantcast