[Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;)

From: sockz loves you (full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com)
Date: 08/24/02 

From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com (sockz loves you)
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:48:02 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: aliver@xexil.com
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 21:18:59 -0700
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;)

> > No Sockz, not a 'petty attack'.
>
> I don't really know Sockz, but it's a little aggravating to see you post
> this to the list. My memory isn't _that_ short. Let's quote your reply to
> him:
>
> " Perhaps if you spent more time actually working on your course and not
> hanging in #phrack you'd have known that. "
>
> This is _clearly_ a personal attack, and also quite accurately described
> as "petty". Don't insult the intelligence of the list members by
> suggesting otherwise.

thanks aliver, but i can hold my own. i wasn't _really_ that insulted by the
comment. just surprised i spose. i'm laffing about it at the moment cuz i'm
currently banned from #phrack for reasons beyond my ability to change. if my
original response seemed a bit catty then i appologise. btw just to clarify,
i dont claim to be on the PHC. i dont see myself ever being on the PHC. but
that said, i do support their efforts.
 
> > I'm quite willing to go into my reasons off list,
>
> Yes, but you were willing to send this content-free message to the list
> denying that you did anything.
>
> This sounds more like an excuse to me, but since it's unclear exactly what
> your talking about I can't say for sure.

meh. i guess what's being referred to here is the content of those posts after
this one? i thought your story was pretty interesting, though i found myself
unable to reply in depth without bringing forth examples from my own
experiences, the kind which i am not willing to go into over a public list.
i'm guessing this problem is what john/immn was also referring to. which is
completely understandable. suffice to say, i dont envision myself working for
the DoD :) that privilege was pretty much revoked before i even decided to
persue a career in politics/whatever. it doesn't bother me in the slightest.
i cant think of anything more boring than sitting behind a desk all day,
advocating a cause i dont even believe in, just to earn a nice wage. money has
never been as important as my beliefs, and i dont intend on changing those
priorities any time soon.

realistically who would want to be helping the DoD in its current state at the
moment anyway. i mean in terms of policy decisions, its completely f*cked up! 

-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

Relevant Pages

  • [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;)
    ... not being able to work for the DoD you should be worried about. ... Subject: [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy;) ... i dont see myself ever being on the PHC. ... > i'm guessing this problem is what john/immn was also referring to. ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Logo Contest
    ... have you read that book, good literature, but youre kinda referring in a ... dont ask me, im a grease monkey, i do actually keep things running. ... the answers of the FreeBSD peoples on all of that discussion anyways... ... To unsubscribe, ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Fucking india
    ... dont have to be a dick about man. ... Google groups is just a web based conduit to get to/from usenet. ... about what you are referring in your posts. ...
    (rec.music.makers.percussion)
  • Re: Duration showing incorrect figures
    ... I dont quite get your comment 'Its a summary'. ... What are you referring to? ... Trevor Rabey ... PERFECT PROJECT PLANNING ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • Re: import statement
    ... we are referring to the java/util/*.class classes. ... where is this package located in my jdk directory. ... Also i dont need ... so for following directory structure: ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)