[Full-Disclosure] it's all about timing

From: Joey Kelly (full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com)
Date: 08/01/02


From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com (Joey Kelly)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 21:06:25 +0000


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thou spake:
>On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Eric N. Valor wrote:
>> Are we enough of an ad-hoc "authority" to attempt to determine a proper
>> course of action for these instances? Codifying this (even if it's just a
>> "gentlemen's agreement") would most definitely be A Good Thing.
>
>RFPolicy always seemed reasonable to me.

Got a URL for that?

- --

Joey Kelly
< Minister of the Gospel | Computer Networking Consultant >
http://joeykelly.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9SaLSTACso8v35Y4RAqiPAJ9CH0CmMuXXS5Ga3pBab3z8leUIJgCfY8Aj
j1WIut13t29/9JIly7+PEUU=
=mIrZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Relevant Pages

  • [Full-Disclosure] its all about timing
    ... > Hash: SHA1 ... > Thou spake: ... Codifying this (even if it's just a ... >>RFPolicy always seemed reasonable to me. ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • [Full-Disclosure] its all about timing
    ... On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Eric N. Valor wrote: ... Codifying this (even if it's just a ... > "gentlemen's agreement") would most definitely be A Good Thing. ... RFPolicy always seemed reasonable to me. ...
    (Full-Disclosure)