[Full-Disclosure] OT: Snosoft vs HP
From: Dehner, Benjamin T. (full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com)
Date: 07/31/02
- Next message: Tom Perrine: "[Full-Disclosure] OT: Snosoft vs HP"
- Previous message: Cushing, David: "[Full-Disclosure] OT: Snosoft vs HP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com (Dehner, Benjamin T.) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 13:41:00 -0500
Security through litigation:
"Our product is secure, because we will sue you if you say otherwise."
While HP may or may not be legally in the right -- I'll let the lawyers
decide that -- I'm the one going to be up at 3AM rebuilding a server some
blackhat crashed. And I don't get paid by the hour. I intend to have a
talk with the IS director about our future acquisition and use of HP
equipment.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pinskia@physics.uc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:53 PM
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] OT: Snosoft vs HP
Actually HP was pissed at Theo for what OpenSSH did.
It sounds like HP had to hire back the OSF/1 (oops mach opps
Utitrix oops Tru64) people back to make patches for OpenSSH.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Full-Disclosure@lists.netsys.com
http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
- Next message: Tom Perrine: "[Full-Disclosure] OT: Snosoft vs HP"
- Previous message: Cushing, David: "[Full-Disclosure] OT: Snosoft vs HP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|