[Full-Disclosure] Security Update: [CSSA-2002-032.0] Linux: t emporary file races in libmm
From: Stuart Thomas (full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com)
Date: 07/31/02
- Next message: Schmehl, Paul L: "[Full-Disclosure] The SUPER Bug"
- Previous message: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com: "[Full-Disclosure] The SUPER Bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com (Stuart Thomas) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:14:06 +0100
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_000_01C2389C.881D4B30
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Is there a technical version of this Full-Disclosure list?, or
is this just the list for discussing the finer academic intricacies of
balanced arguments?
[Flame-Bate]
------_=_NextPart_000_01C2389C.881D4B30
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Description: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security Update: [CSSA-2002-032.0] Linux: temporary file races in libmm
Message-ID: <1028122041.28063.26.camel@gaspode.localnet>
From: Nigel Metheringham <Nigel.Metheringham@dev.InTechnology.co.uk>
Reply-To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Security Update: [CSSA-2002-032.0] Linux: t
emporary file races in libmm
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 14:27:20 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
List-Help: <mailto:full-disclosure-request@lists.netsys.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure>,<mailto:full-disclosure-request@lists.netsys.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure>,<mailto:full-disclosure-request@lists.netsys.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 13:24, John Cartwright wrote:
> We believe that the vendor notifications are useful information. To
> provide a viable alternative to other more commercial lists, we need to
> extend our reach to as wide a range of people as possible. I have been
> campaigning for vendors to submit content to us for this reason.
Personally I'd prefer the vendor notifications to be put on a parallel
list, because
1. A flurry of 100s of one-man-and-their-dog Linux distributions
announcing a security update obscures the real discussion
(especially as each announcement is in its own thread).
2. I already get (multiple) copies of this stuff. Save the
electrons, give me a chance to not duplicate to that extent.
[Damn, we're back to list meta discussions - this is the most
introspective list I have ever been on :-) ]
Nigel.
-- [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@InTechnology.co.uk ] [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Full-Disclosure@lists.netsys.com http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure ------_=_NextPart_000_01C2389C.881D4B30--
- Next message: Schmehl, Paul L: "[Full-Disclosure] The SUPER Bug"
- Previous message: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com: "[Full-Disclosure] The SUPER Bug"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|