[Full-Disclosure] OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable?
From: Helmut Springer (full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com)
Date: 07/31/02
- Next message: Thomas Oppel: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable?"
- Previous message: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com: "[Full-Disclosure] Security Update: [CSSA-2002-032.0] Linux: temporary file races in libmm"
- In reply to: Jedi/Sector One: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable?"
- Next in thread: Thomas Oppel: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com (Helmut Springer) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:28:32 +0200
On 31 Jul 2002 at 09:13 +0200, Jedi/Sector One wrote:
> But you don't need a new mod_ssl version to be safe against it.
> Only bring OpenSSL up to date, and your mod_ssl module will be
> safe.
...if it is linked dynamically. Make sure.
-- MfG/best regards, helmut springer delta@citecs.de
- Next message: Thomas Oppel: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable?"
- Previous message: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com: "[Full-Disclosure] Security Update: [CSSA-2002-032.0] Linux: temporary file races in libmm"
- In reply to: Jedi/Sector One: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable?"
- Next in thread: Thomas Oppel: "[Full-Disclosure] OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
