[Full-Disclosure] Sharutils buggy?

From: Charles 'core' Stevenson (full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com)
Date: 07/16/02 

From: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com (Charles 'core' Stevenson)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:41:01 -0600

Sorry for the spam all... my last message was sent in hast thinking I'd
made an error. It does in fact create the uuecoded file with 666 perms
because I remembered to call umask 0.. when I tested locally I forgot to
removed the first uuencode file I'd created before chaning umask...
sorry and enjoy the search for a program that calls uudecode as root on
a user supplied file.

peace,
core

Relevant Pages

  • [Full-Disclosure] Sharutils buggy?
    ... Sorry for the spam all... ... my last message was sent in hast thinking I'd ... It does in fact create the uuecoded file with 666 perms ... removed the first uuencode file I'd created before chaning umask... ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • [Full-Disclosure] Sharutils buggy?
    ... Sorry for the spam all... ... my last message was sent in hast thinking I'd ... It does in fact create the uuecoded file with 666 perms ... removed the first uuencode file I'd created before chaning umask... ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • [Full-Disclosure] Sharutils buggy?
    ... Sorry for the spam all... ... my last message was sent in hast thinking I'd ... It does in fact create the uuecoded file with 666 perms ... removed the first uuencode file I'd created before chaning umask... ...
    (Full-Disclosure)