Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- From: Martin Schütte <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:50:24 +0100
On 17.02.2012 20:48, Roger Marquis wrote:
and difficult to change without breaking more than it fixes. The current
syslog syntax timestamp has been reliable now for what, 25+ years? I
don't personally see any measurable ROI from changing it. YMMV of
course.
I really understand the concern, but some requirements do change over
time. Staying at the lowest common denominator for 25+ years may
indicate robustness, but it may also indicate obsolence.
I would like to ask a different question: what is our target? What kind
of logging infrastructure should a current operating system provide? And
how can we move forward toward that?
YMMV, but for me this target includes ISO timestamps, TLS network
transport, UTF-8 support, and more structured messages.
The IETF protocols are part of the solution, traditional BSD Syslog is
not enough.
A few more thoughts for the discussion:
- with ISO dates it is easy to pipe logs through a timestamp-rewriting
perl script for older analysis tools. And some tools already support ISO
dates (for example the latest version of pflogsumm).
- similar compatibility questions arise with UTF-8 data in logs.
syslogd(8) writes ASCII-only logs to ensure wide compatibility.
- some admins (including myself) already moved to syslog-ng for these
two reasons: TLS transport and ISO timestamps.
- regarding timestamps: I guess everyone with a long-term log archive
already has some year/month scheme, so IMHO the year is only a nice
bonus rather than a big feature. -- Bigger benefits are sub-second
resolution and timezone information (because with daylight saving time
even a standalone system spans two timezones).
- in principle the NetBSD-current syslogd(8) even supports a per-target
configuration of old/new log format. But iirc this is not enabled,
because such a flag would add more clutter to the syslog.conf(5) syntax.
--
Martin Schütte
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- From: Roger Marquis
- Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- From: Sergey Kandaurov
- Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- From: Roger Marquis
- Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- Prev by Date: Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- Next by Date: Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- Previous by thread: Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- Next by thread: Re: periodic security run output gives false positives after 1 year
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|