Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- From: Andy Kosela <akosela@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:41:35 +0100
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Christian Weisgerber
<naddy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rob Farmer <rfarmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They won't be secondary if someone does find a minor bug in the
network stack (regardless who introduced it or if it is even related),
which will probably happen given the attention this will invariably
receive.
Here's the first one:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=129245633605693&w=2
Like des@ written in the other post even if the backdoor is still
present in the OpenBSD code, IMHO it is very probable that FreeBSD is
unaffected as the FreeBSD OCF implementation has been substantially
modified.
http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/bsdcon03/tech/leffler_crypto/leffler_crypto.pdf
Either way we will all know for sure in the not distant future...
--Andy
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- From: Andy Kosela
- Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- From: Rob Farmer
- Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- From: b. f.
- Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- From: Rob Farmer
- Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- From: Christian Weisgerber
- Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- Prev by Date: Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- Next by Date: [capsicum] Capability Mode (fwd)
- Previous by thread: Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- Next by thread: Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC
- Index(es):