Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:25:29 +0100
Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx> writes:
Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@xxxxxxxxx> writes:from Linux-PAM-0.78 to Linux-PAM-1.0.3.
I will plan to upgrade the PAM library and see how it goes.Upgrade what from what to what?
Uh, so, why did you post to a FreeBSD mailing list? This has nothing to
do with FreeBSD, since FreeBSD does not use Linux-PAM (not since 5.1
came out).
And why didn't you answer this question the first time I asked it? Why
did you not tell us right away which version of which library you were
using, on which operating system? How can we answer your question if
you won't tell us what the question is?
Suggested reading:
http://www.gerv.net/hacking/how-to-ask-good-questions/
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- From: Ivan Grover
- Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- References:
- Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- From: Ivan Grover
- Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav
- Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- Prev by Date: Re: New CURL Advisory (fixed in 7.19.4)
- Next by Date: emacs installs a lot of 777 directories
- Previous by thread: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- Next by thread: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|