Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:02:53 +0100
Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
I debugged pam_unix aswell, it looks like crypt function is giving
different strings for telnet and my application with same passwd
string and salt. So i think the issue could be with crypt library
linked telnet and my application.
please let me know your thoughts
There's not much I can say (or think) since you still haven't told me
what you upgraded *from* and *to*, but I doubt very much that there is
anything wrong with crypt(). The only two possibilities I can think of
are a) your application calls set_crypt_format() with an incorrect
argument, or b) your application contains an alternate (incorrect)
implementation of crypt(), or is linked to a library that does.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- From: Ivan Grover
- Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- Prev by Date: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- Next by Date: RE: OPIE considered insecure
- Previous by thread: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- Next by thread: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
- Index(es):