Re: A new kind of security needed
- From: Chris Palmer <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:36:03 -0700
Matt Reimer wrote:
Is anyone else nervous trusting all his programs to have access to all
his files? Is there already a reasonable solution to this problem?
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~KeyKOS/Confinement.html
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/qmailsec-20071101.pdf
Also: CapDesk, Bitfrost, systrace, EROS/Coyotos
In general, solutions have proven to be vaporware, very burdensome to use (systrace), or reduced in scope (Bernstein's single-source transforms). The success rate is not zero, though, and I too crave a solution...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- A new kind of security needed
- From: Matt Reimer
- A new kind of security needed
- Prev by Date: A new kind of security needed
- Next by Date: Re: A new kind of security needed
- Previous by thread: A new kind of security needed
- Next by thread: Re: A new kind of security needed
- Index(es):