Re: MD5 Collisions...
- From: Colin Percival <cperciva@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:25:38 -0800
Norberto Meijome wrote:
should some kind of advisory be sent to advise people not to rely solely on MD5 checksums? Maybe an update to the man page is due ? :
"
MD5 has not yet (2001-09-03) been broken, but sufficient attacks have
been made that its security is in some doubt. The attacks on MD5 are in
the nature of finding ``collisions'' -- that is, multiple inputs which
hash to the same value; it is still unlikely for an attacker to be able
to determine the exact original input given a hash value.
"
I fail to see how the man page is incorrect here. What do you think it should
be saying instead?
Colin Percival
FreeBSD Security Officer
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MD5 Collisions...
- From: Iang
- Re: MD5 Collisions...
- From: Norberto Meijome
- Re: MD5 Collisions...
- References:
- MD5 Collisions...
- From: Norberto Meijome
- MD5 Collisions...
- Prev by Date: Re: MD5 Collisions...
- Next by Date: Re: MD5 Collisions...
- Previous by thread: Re: MD5 Collisions...
- Next by thread: Re: MD5 Collisions...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|